Many European and worldwide cities are reallocating road space to walkers, cyclists, buses and trams in preparation for a low-carbon future. Here's what Sheffield is doing:-
Here a cycle route is being destroyed in order to make room for a few more cars. The cycle route, which is part of the flagship Trans-Pennine Trail, will be replaced but will be diverted and will be much narrower. This is in an area with some of the worst air pollution in Europe.
Here is another, nearby, example of cycle route planning in Sheffield
This is the Trans-Pennine Trail crossing of Meadowhall Rd. The walker or cyclist has to cross three busy two-lane carriageways. It is impossible to see the traffic lights so you have to guess whether the traffic is going to stop or not and make a run for it. This route is supposed to be cycleable by a 12-year-old unaccompanied. There have been a number of collisions involving cyclists in the area.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
TRO's
New stuff in from the council -
Tesco Development - Savile St.
This development will entail a new entrance from Spital Hill, thus part of the bus lane will be revoked. Part of Savile St will be made a clearway. Carlisle St will be closed off at the junction with
Spital Hill (but not for cyclists we hope) The main entrance will be on Savile St - I believe there will be an off-road cycle lane & toucan crossing at this point which I am not particularly happy about.
Whiteways School
Restriction of parking outside the school.
Tesco Development - Savile St.
This development will entail a new entrance from Spital Hill, thus part of the bus lane will be revoked. Part of Savile St will be made a clearway. Carlisle St will be closed off at the junction with
Spital Hill (but not for cyclists we hope) The main entrance will be on Savile St - I believe there will be an off-road cycle lane & toucan crossing at this point which I am not particularly happy about.
Whiteways School
Restriction of parking outside the school.
Friday, December 18, 2009
Shefffield TRO's December 2009
Have been asked for comments on the following proposals:
Ringinglow Rd increased parking restrictions to improve child safety close to Ecclesall Junior.
Sharrow Vale comprehensive revisions to parking schemes.
- Endcliffe
- Sharrow Vale & Botanical
- Stalker Lees
- Napier
- Lansdowne
- Grange
- Porterbrook
- Hunter House.
Any comments welcome.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Some things that Sheffield cyclists need to make their voices heard on..
Meadowhead roundabout & Woodseats http://bit.ly/7HPz4
Penistone Rd http://bit.ly/6Urwda
Ecclesall Rd http://www.smartroutes.co.uk/ecclesallroad/
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Hillsborough Corner TRO
I've had the notification of the Experimental Traffic Order that amends the hours of operation of the bus and tram gates on Middlewood Rd from 0700 to 1900 daily to 0700-1100 and 1500-1900 on Monday to Saturday inclusive
As it is experimental it will be in force for six months and the City Council will be considering whether the provisions of the Experimental Order should be continued in force indefinitely.
The grounds for objection, should anyone wish to do so, are quite specific so I am copying them here:-
Any person who wishes to question the validity of the Order or any of its provisions on the grounds that it is not within the powers of the enabling Act or that a requirement of the enabling Act or any of the relevant regulations made thereunder has not been complied with may, within six weeks of the 29th day of October 2009, make application for that purpose to the High Court.
As you can see from that the grounds for objection are pretty stringent!
However I can see one potential grounds for objection, that this notice is dated "this 30th day of October" - i.e. tomorrow.
I think the hours that the bus gate will operate for cover a large part of the working day and it might not be as bad as we feared. There is an opportunity to make representations during the six month experimental period,
Also covered in this mailing:-
Lydgate Lane and Monteney Crescent
Basically traffic calming around Lydgate Infant & Middle School
Meadow Street Revised Permit Parking Scheme.
Adjustments to the existing parking permit scheme.
Will be happy to pass on plans to anyone who wants to have a look.
Address for making representations:-
Mrs C Doran
Development Environment and Leisure
2-10 Carbrook Hall,
Sheffield
S9 2DB
As it is experimental it will be in force for six months and the City Council will be considering whether the provisions of the Experimental Order should be continued in force indefinitely.
The grounds for objection, should anyone wish to do so, are quite specific so I am copying them here:-
Any person who wishes to question the validity of the Order or any of its provisions on the grounds that it is not within the powers of the enabling Act or that a requirement of the enabling Act or any of the relevant regulations made thereunder has not been complied with may, within six weeks of the 29th day of October 2009, make application for that purpose to the High Court.
As you can see from that the grounds for objection are pretty stringent!
However I can see one potential grounds for objection, that this notice is dated "this 30th day of October" - i.e. tomorrow.
I think the hours that the bus gate will operate for cover a large part of the working day and it might not be as bad as we feared. There is an opportunity to make representations during the six month experimental period,
Also covered in this mailing:-
Lydgate Lane and Monteney Crescent
Basically traffic calming around Lydgate Infant & Middle School
Meadow Street Revised Permit Parking Scheme.
Adjustments to the existing parking permit scheme.
Will be happy to pass on plans to anyone who wants to have a look.
Address for making representations:-
Mrs C Doran
Development Environment and Leisure
2-10 Carbrook Hall,
Sheffield
S9 2DB
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Issues for Cycle Forum
Cyclesheffield has posted the following issues for response by the council at the Cycle Forum:-
Penistone Road / Hillfoot
On the recent NCN6 ride it was noted that the cycle crossing at Hillfoot/Penistone road didn't seem to have been retimed to take advantage of the new left turn only lane making this a very long wait.
Corporation Street: Roundabout over river cycle lane The signal controlled cycle lane across the centre of the roundabout from Mowbray St to Nursery St is activated by a waiting cyclist. On arriving at this signal traffic is often emerging from Nursery St suggesting that it would be safe to cycle across rather than stop – but the signal is on red and it takes quite a while to wait for the next Nursery St phase. Changing this would speed up cyclist journeys and increase use of this cycle lane.
West St / Eldon St
The cycle bypass to allow cyclists uphill onto West St has a noentry
sign – is it missing an 'Except Cyclists' sign underneath? (FYI this is easily viewed on Google Streetview)
Abbeydale Road / Fieldhead Road & Staveley Road
How about a toucan crossing on Abbeydale Road at Fieldhead and Staveley Roads? This would
allow cyclists to get across more easily in traffic and complement the existing cycle route here. A lot of pedestrians struggle to get across here too.
I have a few more, gathered at last nights cyclesheffield meeting - apologies for late submission, I appreciate it may not be possible to provide answers for todays meeting:
Mappin St - the contraflow lane was "overlooked" when this was made one-way, then delayed by the RNIB re-build. When will this now be implemented?
Clarkson-Osborne building, Penistone Rd - I read in the Telegraph that this is now to be demolished, which is a great shame as it is a classic building of its type. However, it does give an opportunity to sort out this section of the Penistone Rd cycle route, NCN6, which passes too close to the vehicle access points of the building for safety. Could officers please ensure that this problem is addressed?
We were advised that Supertram cyclist's safety work would commence during this financial year, but we have yet to see anything on the ground. When is this scheduled for?
Bramall Lane subways - is there any progress on "cycle-ising" this, as it now has cycle lanes approaching from nearly every direction? (With the exception of Bramall Lane - London Rd to the south of St Mary's gate, which would be useful for some journeys)
Mappin St - the contraflow lane was "overlooked" when this was made one-way, then delayed by the RNIB re-build. When will this now be implemented?
Clarkson-Osborne building, Penistone Rd - I read in the Telegraph that this is now to be demolished, which is a great shame as it is a classic building of its type. However, it does give an opportunity to sort out this section of the Penistone Rd cycle route, NCN6, which passes too close to the vehicle access points of the building for safety. Could officers please ensure that this problem is addressed?
We were advised that Supertram cyclist's safety work would commence during this financial year, but we have yet to see anything on the ground. When is this scheduled for?
Bramall Lane subways - is there any progress on "cycle-ising" this, as it now has cycle lanes approaching from nearly every direction? (With the exception of Bramall Lane - London Rd to the south of St Mary's gate, which would be useful for some journeys)
Monday, September 14, 2009
2 New planning apps
The council has submitted 2 new planning apps: one is for an extension to the Chapeltown Greenway - this will take it as far as the Yalta industrial Estate which IS in Chapeltown: A future extension will link it to the TPT at NCN/TPT at Cart Road early next year, subject to a funding bid recently submitted. The route will be bituminized as well. This is great news for Chapeltown residents who will have a route free of motor traffic all the way to Meadowhall. In particular it will avoid the nasty hill between Chapeltown and Ecclesfield.
The other one is for an "iconic" bridge over the Parkway near Tinsley Golf Course. This will remedy the shameful current situation where pedestrians, cyclists and horse-riders are supposed to cross the 70 mph Sheffield Parkway at surface level.
I will be writing to support both these applications - should you wish to comment you can do so
at SCC's planning portal, http://planning.sheffield.gov.uk/publicaccess/DC/dc_home.aspx
by searching for following refs:
Chapeltown Ref: 09/02522/FUL
Parkway Ref: 09/02783/FUL
Saturday, August 22, 2009
More Traffic Regulation Orders
Glossop Rd: Extend tram gate as far as Cavendish St. Operating 4-6:30 p.m.
we support this although there are concerns about the impact on cyclists using the Portobello cycle route, as traffic will be diverted across it.
Parson Cross Child Safety Zone
We Support this: However we would like to see the implementation of CSV's accelerated by bringing in 20mph zones without waiting for infrastructure improvements.
we support this although there are concerns about the impact on cyclists using the Portobello cycle route, as traffic will be diverted across it.
Parson Cross Child Safety Zone
We Support this: However we would like to see the implementation of CSV's accelerated by bringing in 20mph zones without waiting for infrastructure improvements.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
TRO's
Wincobank School, Newman Rd & Lydgate Lane
Traffic calming & Waiting restrictions.
CTC supports these proposals.
Traffic calming & Waiting restrictions.
CTC supports these proposals.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
TROs
Bunch of TRO's relating to the Tudor Square refurbishment, tightening up parking and loading restrictions. I'm going to write to support these.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Bus Punctuality Improvement Plan
Responded to this today.
The proposal covers a raft of measure to extend bus lanes on Bolsover St, Exchange Place, introduce a bus gate at Station Rd Woodhouse, and revoke an existing bus gate at Southey Hill (which was unpopular with residents apparently) replacing it with traffic calming.
It is also proposed to exclude motorcycles from bus gates on Furnival Rd at Derek Dooley Way, Holme Lane to Langsett Rd at Hillsboro Corner, Infirmary Rd to Penistone Rd at Shalesmoor, London Rd at Asline Rd, & Shalesmoor. This is because DfT rules do not allow the council to lawfully sign bus gates for motorcycles.Shucks.
Response:-
Thank you for your letter dated the 18th of March.
We SUPPORT the measures at Bolsover St, Exchange Place/Park Square and Woodhouse terminus.
We OBJECT to the removal of the Bus Gate at Southey Hill. This will increase motor traffic in the area and make it more dangerous for cyclists.
Exclusion of motorcyclists. We are pleased to see that the Department for Transport has taken a more logical view on this issue than Sheffield City Council. However, as the council has previously made it known that motorcycles are allowed to use bus lanes even when there are no signs permitting them to do so, signs should now be erected specifically excluding them from these facilities.
The proposal covers a raft of measure to extend bus lanes on Bolsover St, Exchange Place, introduce a bus gate at Station Rd Woodhouse, and revoke an existing bus gate at Southey Hill (which was unpopular with residents apparently) replacing it with traffic calming.
It is also proposed to exclude motorcycles from bus gates on Furnival Rd at Derek Dooley Way, Holme Lane to Langsett Rd at Hillsboro Corner, Infirmary Rd to Penistone Rd at Shalesmoor, London Rd at Asline Rd, & Shalesmoor. This is because DfT rules do not allow the council to lawfully sign bus gates for motorcycles.Shucks.
Response:-
Thank you for your letter dated the 18th of March.
We SUPPORT the measures at Bolsover St, Exchange Place/Park Square and Woodhouse terminus.
We OBJECT to the removal of the Bus Gate at Southey Hill. This will increase motor traffic in the area and make it more dangerous for cyclists.
Exclusion of motorcyclists. We are pleased to see that the Department for Transport has taken a more logical view on this issue than Sheffield City Council. However, as the council has previously made it known that motorcycles are allowed to use bus lanes even when there are no signs permitting them to do so, signs should now be erected specifically excluding them from these facilities.
Broomhall Parking Review
Responded to this today. In summary:
The 4-hour restrictions should apply to specific parts of the Scheme rather than the whole Scheme: People parking within the whole area should be restricted to 4 hours rather than being able to move within the area - this leads to people swapping places at lunchtime, for instance.
We would not like to see any extra 4-hour or unrestricted parking in the area. The Scheme has made a big difference to the traffic in the area and increased cycling and walking, not just in Broomhall but on the corridors that people use to access the area. We would not like any of the benefits to be taken away. We welcome the extensions to the permit holders only areas.
At the junction of Havelock Street (where I live) and Holberry Gardens the extension of the bays and reduction in the double yellow lines is a bad idea. This area is used a lot by local children playing in the streets and anything which potentially restricts visibility around here is likely to impinge on safety.
4) We welcome the future cycle access at the junction of Holberry Gardens and Brunswick Street. This was omitted from the original scheme for no apparent reason.
The 4-hour restrictions should apply to specific parts of the Scheme rather than the whole Scheme: People parking within the whole area should be restricted to 4 hours rather than being able to move within the area - this leads to people swapping places at lunchtime, for instance.
We would not like to see any extra 4-hour or unrestricted parking in the area. The Scheme has made a big difference to the traffic in the area and increased cycling and walking, not just in Broomhall but on the corridors that people use to access the area. We would not like any of the benefits to be taken away. We welcome the extensions to the permit holders only areas.
At the junction of Havelock Street (where I live) and Holberry Gardens the extension of the bays and reduction in the double yellow lines is a bad idea. This area is used a lot by local children playing in the streets and anything which potentially restricts visibility around here is likely to impinge on safety.
4) We welcome the future cycle access at the junction of Holberry Gardens and Brunswick Street. This was omitted from the original scheme for no apparent reason.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)